
A hospital is overcrowded with experts and doctors each with their own specializations, solving unique problems. Surgeons, cardiologists, pediatricians—experts of all kinds join hands to provide care, often collaborating to get the patients the care they need. We can do the same with AI.
Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture in artificial intelligence is defined as a mix or blend of different “expert” models working together to deal with or respond to complex data inputs. When it comes to AI, every expert in an MoE model specializes in a much larger problem—just like every doctor specializes in their medical field. This improves efficiency and increases system efficacy and accuracy.
Mistral AI delivers open-source foundational LLMs that rival that of OpenAI. They have formally discussed the use of an MoE architecture in their Mixtral 8x7B model, a revolutionary breakthrough in the form of a cutting-edge Large Language Model (LLM). We’ll deep dive into why Mixtral by Mistral AI stands out among other foundational LLMs and why current LLMs now employ the MoE architecture highlighting its speed, size, and accuracy.
To better understand how the MoE architecture enhances our LLMs, let’s discuss common methods for improving LLM efficiency. AI practitioners and developers enhance models by increasing parameters, adjusting the architecture, or fine-tuning.
The Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture is a neural network design that improves efficiency and performance by dynamically activating a subset of specialized networks, called experts, for each input. A gating network determines which experts to activate, leading to sparse activation and reduced computational cost. MoE architecture consists of two critical components: the gating network and the experts. Let’s break that down:
At its heart, the MoE architecture functions like an efficient traffic system, directing each vehicle – or in this case, data – to the best route based on real-time conditions and the desired destination. Each task is routed to the most suitable expert, or sub-model, specialized in handling that particular task. This dynamic routing ensures that the most capable resources are employed for each task, enhancing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the model. The MoE architecture takes advantage of all 3 ways how to improve a model’s fidelity.
The gating network acts as the decision-maker or controller within the MoE model. It evaluates incoming tasks and determines which expert is suited to handle them. This decision is typically based on learned weights, which are adjusted over time through training, further improving its ability to match tasks with experts. The gating network can employ various strategies, from probabilistic methods where soft assignments are tasked to multiple experts, to deterministic methods that route each task to a single expert.
Each expert in the MoE model represents a smaller neural network, machine learning model, or LLM optimized for a specific subset of the problem domain. For example, in Mistral, different experts might specialize in understanding certain languages, dialects, or even types of queries. The specialization ensures each expert is proficient in its niche, which, when combined with the contributions of other experts, will lead to superior performance across a wide array of tasks.
Although not considered a main component of the MoE architecture, the loss function plays a pivotal role in the future performance of the model, as it’s designed to optimize both the individual experts and the gating network.
It typically combines the losses computed for each expert which are weighted by the probability or significance assigned to them by the gating network. This helps to fine-tune the experts for their specific tasks while adjusting the gating network to improve routing accuracy.
Now let’s sum up the entire process, adding more details.
Here’s a summarized explanation of how the routing process works from start to finish:
Ultimately, the main goal of MoE architecture is to present a paradigm shift in how complex machine learning tasks are approached. It offers unique benefits and demonstrates its superiority over traditional models in several ways.
While MoE architecture offers significant advantages, it also comes with challenges that can impact its adoption and effectiveness.
It should be noted that the above drawbacks usually diminish over time as MoE architecture is improved.
Reflecting on the MoE approach and its human parallel, we see that just as specialized teams achieve more than a generalized workforce, specialized models outperform their monolithic counterparts in AI models. Prioritizing diversity and expertise turns the complexity of large-scale problems into manageable segments that experts can tackle effectively.
As we look to the future, consider the broader implications of specialized systems in advancing other technologies. The principles of MoE could influence developments in sectors like healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems, promoting more efficient and accurate solutions.
The journey of MoE is just beginning, and its continued evolution promises to drive further innovation in AI and beyond. As high-performance hardware continues to advance, this mixture of expert AIs can reside in our smartphones, capable of delivering even smarter experiences. But first, someone’s going to need to train one.
Kevin Vu manages Exxact Corp blog and works with many of its talented authors who write about different aspects of Deep Learning.